CMP vs ELVR

Compass Minerals Intl Inc vs Elevra Lithium Limited - Americ — Valuation Comparison 2026

CMP

Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
Compass Minerals Intl Inc
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$31.92
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ELVR

Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
Elevra Lithium Limited - Americ
Quality
4.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$92.64
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CMP Fair ValueCMP Upside ELVR Fair ValueELVR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.32 -39.5% $9.69 -89.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.65 -79.2% $40.75 -52.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CMP vs ELVR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CMP vs ELVR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CMP scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs ELVR's 4.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Compass Minerals Intl Inc (CMP) and Elevra Lithium Limited - Americ (ELVR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CMP currently trades at $31.92 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while ELVR trades at $92.64 with a QOC of 4.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).