CM vs IFS

Canadian Imperial Bank of Comme vs Intercorp Financial Services In — Valuation Comparison 2026

CM

Commercial Banks, NEC
Canadian Imperial Bank of Comme
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$108.74
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

IFS

Commercial Banks, NEC
Intercorp Financial Services In
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$49.48
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CM Fair ValueCM Upside IFS Fair ValueIFS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $54.98 -49.4% $77.73 +57.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $88.43 -18.7% $99.88 +101.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CM vs IFS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CM vs IFS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CM scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs IFS's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Canadian Imperial Bank of Comme (CM) and Intercorp Financial Services In (IFS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CM currently trades at $108.74 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while IFS trades at $49.48 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).