CISS vs DAC

C3is Inc. vs Danaos Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CISS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
C3is Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$2.28
Last close
Models
2/13
Active
VS

DAC

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Danaos Corporation
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$125.21
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CISS Fair ValueCISS Upside DAC Fair ValueDAC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.17 +389.9% $56.04 -55.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $272.62 +108.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $10.37 +354.9% $153.18 +14.9%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CISS vs DAC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CISS vs DAC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CISS scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs DAC's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing C3is Inc. (CISS) and Danaos Corporation (DAC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CISS currently trades at $2.28 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while DAC trades at $125.21 with a QOC of 2.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).