CHTR vs LBRDA

Charter Communications, Inc. vs Liberty Broadband Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CHTR

Cable & Other Pay Television Services
Charter Communications, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$144.05
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

LBRDA

Cable & Other Pay Television Services
Liberty Broadband Corporation
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$33.78
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CHTR Fair ValueCHTR Upside LBRDA Fair ValueLBRDA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $76.27 -47.0% $23.95 -29.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.43 -83.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $113.47 -21.2% $67.95 +101.2%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CHTR vs LBRDA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CHTR vs LBRDA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CHTR scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs LBRDA's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) and Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CHTR currently trades at $144.05 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while LBRDA trades at $33.78 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).