CHNR vs CNL

China Natural Resources, Inc. vs Collective Mining Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CHNR

Gold and Silver Ores
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Quality
3.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$4.08
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

CNL

Gold and Silver Ores
Collective Mining Ltd.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$16.28
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CHNR Fair ValueCHNR Upside CNL Fair ValueCNL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.23 -70.0% $4.26 -73.8%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $12.87 +215.0%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $22.26 +445.0% $14.53 -10.7%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CHNR vs CNL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CHNR vs CNL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CHNR scores higher with a 3.9/10 quality rating vs CNL's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) and Collective Mining Ltd. (CNL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CHNR currently trades at $4.08 with a QOC of 3.9/10, while CNL trades at $16.28 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).