CDRE vs CLGN

Cadre Holdings, Inc. vs CollPlant Biotechnologies Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CDRE

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Cadre Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$31.14
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CLGN

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
CollPlant Biotechnologies Ltd.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.40
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CDRE Fair ValueCDRE Upside CLGN Fair ValueCLGN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.63 -62.7% $0.08 -79.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.50 -95.2% $0.70 +70.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CDRE vs CLGN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CDRE vs CLGN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CDRE scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs CLGN's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cadre Holdings, Inc. (CDRE) and CollPlant Biotechnologies Ltd. (CLGN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CDRE currently trades at $31.14 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while CLGN trades at $0.40 with a QOC of 2.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).