CCS vs DFH

Century Communities, Inc. vs Dream Finders Homes, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CCS

Operative Builders
Century Communities, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$52.82
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

DFH

Operative Builders
Dream Finders Homes, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
47
WARN
Price
$15.46
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CCS Fair ValueCCS Upside DFH Fair ValueDFH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.36 -57.7% $2.00 -86.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.05 -87.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $58.44 +10.6% $8.34 -46.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CCS vs DFH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CCS vs DFH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DFH scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs CCS's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) and Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CCS currently trades at $52.82 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while DFH trades at $15.46 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).