CARR vs GCDT

Carrier Global Corporation vs Green Circle Decarbonize Techno — Valuation Comparison 2026

CARR

Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip
Carrier Global Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$63.87
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

GCDT

Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip
Green Circle Decarbonize Techno
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.98
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CARR Fair ValueCARR Upside GCDT Fair ValueGCDT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $29.22 -54.2% $0.18 -81.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $27.68 -56.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $90.28 +41.4% $0.36 -48.5%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CARR vs GCDT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CARR vs GCDT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CARR scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs GCDT's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) and Green Circle Decarbonize Techno (GCDT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CARR currently trades at $63.87 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while GCDT trades at $0.98 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).