BTSGU vs CARL

BrightSpring Health Services, I vs Carlsmed, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BTSGU

Health Information Services
BrightSpring Health Services, I
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$205.26
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CARL

Health Information Services
Carlsmed, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.81
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BTSGU Fair ValueBTSGU Upside CARL Fair ValueCARL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $60.58 -70.5% $4.52 -61.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.25 -95.5% $6.69 -29.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BTSGU vs CARL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BTSGU vs CARL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BTSGU scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs CARL's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BrightSpring Health Services, I (BTSGU) and Carlsmed, Inc. (CARL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BTSGU currently trades at $205.26 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while CARL trades at $11.81 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).