BTI vs PM

British American Tobacco Indus vs Philip Morris International Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

BTI

Cigarettes
British American Tobacco Indus
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$61.79
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PM

Cigarettes
Philip Morris International Inc
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$177.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BTI Fair ValueBTI Upside PM Fair ValuePM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.86 -64.6% $51.59 -70.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $33.57 -42.2% $62.62 -64.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BTI vs PM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BTI vs PM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PM scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs BTI's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing British American Tobacco Indus (BTI) and Philip Morris International Inc (PM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BTI currently trades at $61.79 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while PM trades at $177.38 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).