BRAG vs FLUT

Bragg Gaming Group Inc. vs Flutter Entertainment plc — Valuation Comparison 2026

BRAG

Gambling
Bragg Gaming Group Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$1.69
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

FLUT

Gambling
Flutter Entertainment plc
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$95.58
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BRAG Fair ValueBRAG Upside FLUT Fair ValueFLUT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.78 +182.9% $17.77 -81.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.59 +230.7% $106.83 +11.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BRAG vs FLUT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BRAG vs FLUT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FLUT scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs BRAG's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (BRAG) and Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BRAG currently trades at $1.69 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while FLUT trades at $95.58 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).