BOOT vs CATO

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. vs Cato Corporation (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

BOOT

Apparel Retail
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$170.77
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CATO

Apparel Retail
Cato Corporation (The)
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$3.26
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BOOT Fair ValueBOOT Upside CATO Fair ValueCATO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.61 -93.2% $8.13 +149.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $35.55 -79.2% $4.64 +62.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BOOT vs CATO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BOOT vs CATO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BOOT scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs CATO's 7.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Cato Corporation (The) (CATO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BOOT currently trades at $170.77 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while CATO trades at $3.26 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).