BON vs FTLF

Bon Natural Life Limited vs FitLife Brands, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BON

Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products
Bon Natural Life Limited
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$1.27
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

FTLF

Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products
FitLife Brands, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
58
WARN
Price
$10.22
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BON Fair ValueBON Upside FTLF Fair ValueFTLF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.26 -79.2% $6.50 -36.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.28 -78.2% $8.12 -20.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BON vs FTLF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BON vs FTLF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FTLF scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs BON's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Bon Natural Life Limited (BON) and FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BON currently trades at $1.27 with a QOC of 2.1/10, while FTLF trades at $10.22 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).