BIAF vs BNR

bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. vs Burning Rock Biotech Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

BIAF

Diagnostics & Research
bioAffinity Technologies, Inc.
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
49
WARN
Price
$1.65
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

BNR

Diagnostics & Research
Burning Rock Biotech Limited
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$10.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BIAF Fair ValueBIAF Upside BNR Fair ValueBNR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.71 -56.7% $6.13 -39.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.99 -82.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.18 -91.8% $4.55 -54.9%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BIAF vs BNR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BIAF vs BNR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BNR scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs BIAF's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAF) and Burning Rock Biotech Limited (BNR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BIAF currently trades at $1.65 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while BNR trades at $10.10 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).