BGSI vs CARG

Boyd Group Services Inc. vs CarGurus, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BGSI

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Boyd Group Services Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$107.70
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CARG

Auto & Truck Dealerships
CarGurus, Inc.
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$30.35
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BGSI Fair ValueBGSI Upside CARG Fair ValueCARG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $167.48 +55.5% $46.85 +54.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.86 -76.0% $18.70 -38.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BGSI vs CARG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BGSI vs CARG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CARG scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs BGSI's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI) and CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BGSI currently trades at $107.70 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while CARG trades at $30.35 with a QOC of 9.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).