BEKE vs FTHM

KE Holdings Inc vs Fathom Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BEKE

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
KE Holdings Inc
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$16.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FTHM

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Fathom Holdings Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$0.57
Last close
Models
4/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BEKE Fair ValueBEKE Upside FTHM Fair ValueFTHM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.59 -66.3% $0.21 -63.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.78 -89.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.09 -93.5% $0.14 -75.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BEKE vs FTHM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BEKE vs FTHM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BEKE scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs FTHM's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing KE Holdings Inc (BEKE) and Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BEKE currently trades at $16.60 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while FTHM trades at $0.57 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).