BCRX vs BEAM

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Beam Therapeutics Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BCRX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$8.91
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BEAM

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$32.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BCRX Fair ValueBCRX Upside BEAM Fair ValueBEAM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $14.22 +66.7% $8.58 -74.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.33 -74.2% $15.21 -43.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BCRX vs BEAM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BCRX vs BEAM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BCRX scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs BEAM's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) and Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BCRX currently trades at $8.91 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while BEAM trades at $32.93 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).