BBLG vs CDRE

Bone Biologics Corp vs Cadre Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BBLG

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Bone Biologics Corp
Quality
3.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.32
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

CDRE

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Cadre Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$31.14
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BBLG Fair ValueBBLG Upside CDRE Fair ValueCDRE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.71 +29.7% $11.63 -62.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.50 -95.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.30 -76.9% $12.89 -58.6%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BBLG vs CDRE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BBLG vs CDRE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CDRE scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs BBLG's 3.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Bone Biologics Corp (BBLG) and Cadre Holdings, Inc. (CDRE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BBLG currently trades at $1.32 with a QOC of 3.7/10, while CDRE trades at $31.14 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).