BAM vs CG

Brookfield Asset Management Inc vs The Carlyle Group Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BAM

Investment Advice
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$48.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CG

Investment Advice
The Carlyle Group Inc.
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
50
WARN
Price
$45.43
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BAM Fair ValueBAM Upside CG Fair ValueCG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.03 -81.4% $4.54 -91.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.07 -77.2% $15.75 -65.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BAM vs CG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BAM vs CG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BAM scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs CG's 7.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Brookfield Asset Management Inc (BAM) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BAM currently trades at $48.60 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while CG trades at $45.43 with a QOC of 7.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).