BAK vs CNEY

Braskem SA vs CN Energy Group Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BAK

Industrial Organic Chemicals
Braskem SA
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$4.16
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

CNEY

Industrial Organic Chemicals
CN Energy Group Inc.
Quality
1.6
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$1.00
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BAK Fair ValueBAK Upside CNEY Fair ValueCNEY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.04 +357.6% $0.40 -60.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $11.57 +178.1% $1.90 +25.7%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $1.31 +31.3%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BAK vs CNEY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BAK vs CNEY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BAK scores higher with a 5.5/10 quality rating vs CNEY's 1.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Braskem SA (BAK) and CN Energy Group Inc. (CNEY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BAK currently trades at $4.16 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while CNEY trades at $1.00 with a QOC of 1.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).