AXS vs FNF

Axis Capital Holdings Limited vs Fidelity National Financial, In — Valuation Comparison 2026

AXS

Insurance - Specialty
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$95.79
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FNF

Insurance - Specialty
Fidelity National Financial, In
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$47.56
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AXS Fair ValueAXS Upside FNF Fair ValueFNF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $197.86 +106.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $126.86 +32.4% $53.40 +12.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $94.55 -1.3% $36.16 -24.0%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AXS vs FNF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AXS vs FNF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AXS scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs FNF's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Axis Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) and Fidelity National Financial, In (FNF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AXS currently trades at $95.79 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while FNF trades at $47.56 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).