AXS vs DGICA

Axis Capital Holdings Limited vs Donegal Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AXS

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$94.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

DGICA

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Donegal Group, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$16.97
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AXS Fair ValueAXS Upside DGICA Fair ValueDGICA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $105.23 +10.9% $18.42 +8.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $126.86 +33.6% $24.20 +42.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AXS vs DGICA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AXS vs DGICA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DGICA scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs AXS's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Axis Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) and Donegal Group, Inc. (DGICA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AXS currently trades at $94.93 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while DGICA trades at $16.97 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).