AXS vs CNA

Axis Capital Holdings Limited vs CNA Financial Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

AXS

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$94.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CNA

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
CNA Financial Corporation
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$42.06
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AXS Fair ValueAXS Upside CNA Fair ValueCNA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $105.23 +10.9% $195.65 +365.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $126.86 +33.6% $28.35 -32.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AXS vs CNA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AXS vs CNA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AXS scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs CNA's 8.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Axis Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) and CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AXS currently trades at $94.93 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while CNA trades at $42.06 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).