AXR vs IRS

AMREP Corporation vs IRSA Inversiones Y Representaci — Valuation Comparison 2026

AXR

Land Subdividers & Developers (No Cemeteries)
AMREP Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$25.02
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IRS

Land Subdividers & Developers (No Cemeteries)
IRSA Inversiones Y Representaci
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$15.44
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AXR Fair ValueAXR Upside IRS Fair ValueIRS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.57 -21.8% $3.72 -75.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.74 -9.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $18.53 -25.9% $8.95 -42.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AXR vs IRS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AXR vs IRS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AXR scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs IRS's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AMREP Corporation (AXR) and IRSA Inversiones Y Representaci (IRS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AXR currently trades at $25.02 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while IRS trades at $15.44 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).