AXIL vs CL

AXIL Brands, Inc. vs Colgate-Palmolive Company — Valuation Comparison 2026

AXIL

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
AXIL Brands, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$6.71
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CL

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
11
SAFE
Price
$90.13
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AXIL Fair ValueAXIL Upside CL Fair ValueCL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.63 -45.9% $58.99 -34.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.56 -61.8% $25.93 -71.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AXIL vs CL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AXIL vs CL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CL scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs AXIL's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AXIL Brands, Inc. (AXIL) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AXIL currently trades at $6.71 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while CL trades at $90.13 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).