AWI vs CMT

Armstrong World Industries Inc vs Core Molding Technologies Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

AWI

Plastics Products, NEC
Armstrong World Industries Inc
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$157.90
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CMT

Plastics Products, NEC
Core Molding Technologies Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$23.69
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AWI Fair ValueAWI Upside CMT Fair ValueCMT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $60.18 -61.9% $6.51 -72.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $71.43 -54.8% $3.15 -86.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AWI vs CMT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AWI vs CMT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AWI scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs CMT's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Armstrong World Industries Inc (AWI) and Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AWI currently trades at $157.90 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while CMT trades at $23.69 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).