AVA vs CMS

Avista Corporation vs CMS Energy Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

AVA

Electric & Other Services Combined
Avista Corporation
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$41.47
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CMS

Electric & Other Services Combined
CMS Energy Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$72.57
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AVA Fair ValueAVA Upside CMS Fair ValueCMS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $120.44 +194.3% $15.86 -78.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.24 -46.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $30.18 -27.2% $13.83 -80.9%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AVA vs CMS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AVA vs CMS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AVA scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs CMS's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Avista Corporation (AVA) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AVA currently trades at $41.47 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while CMS trades at $72.57 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).