AUST vs CHNR

Austin Gold Corp. vs China Natural Resources, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AUST

Gold and Silver Ores
Austin Gold Corp.
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$1.38
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

CHNR

Gold and Silver Ores
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Quality
3.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$4.08
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AUST Fair ValueAUST Upside CHNR Fair ValueCHNR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.33 -75.8% $1.23 -70.0%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.39 -72.0% $12.87 +215.0%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $1.05 -24.2% $22.26 +445.0%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AUST vs CHNR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AUST vs CHNR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CHNR scores higher with a 3.9/10 quality rating vs AUST's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Austin Gold Corp. (AUST) and China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AUST currently trades at $1.38 with a QOC of 2.4/10, while CHNR trades at $4.08 with a QOC of 3.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).