ATRO vs EH

Astronics Corporation vs EHang Holdings Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

ATRO

Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
Astronics Corporation
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$87.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

EH

Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
EHang Holdings Limited
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.16
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ATRO Fair ValueATRO Upside EH Fair ValueEH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.69 -94.2% $2.51 -75.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.82 -99.0% $0.33 -96.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ATRO vs EH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ATRO vs EH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ATRO scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs EH's 7.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and EHang Holdings Limited (EH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ATRO currently trades at $87.00 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while EH trades at $10.16 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).