ATO vs EE

Atmos Energy Corporation vs Excelerate Energy, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ATO

Natural Gas Distribution
Atmos Energy Corporation
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$169.13
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EE

Natural Gas Distribution
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$32.94
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ATO Fair ValueATO Upside EE Fair ValueEE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $168.42 -5.1% $53.76 +63.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.36 -89.1% $0.56 -98.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ATO vs EE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ATO vs EE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EE scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs ATO's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ATO currently trades at $169.13 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while EE trades at $32.94 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).