ATLX vs CMP

Atlas Lithium Corporation vs Compass Minerals Intl Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

ATLX

Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
Atlas Lithium Corporation
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.22
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

CMP

Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)
Compass Minerals Intl Inc
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$31.92
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ATLX Fair ValueATLX Upside CMP Fair ValueCMP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.59 -62.4% $19.32 -39.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.65 -79.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.18 -96.0% $20.73 -35.1%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ATLX vs CMP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ATLX vs CMP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CMP scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs ATLX's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Atlas Lithium Corporation (ATLX) and Compass Minerals Intl Inc (CMP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ATLX currently trades at $4.22 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while CMP trades at $31.92 with a QOC of 6.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).