ASTS vs GOGO

AST SpaceMobile, Inc. vs Gogo Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASTS

Communications Services, NEC
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$113.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GOGO

Communications Services, NEC
Gogo Inc.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$4.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASTS Fair ValueASTS Upside GOGO Fair ValueGOGO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $33.13 -70.8% $1.02 -77.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $26.71 -65.0% $0.22 -94.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASTS vs GOGO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASTS vs GOGO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GOGO scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs ASTS's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Gogo Inc. (GOGO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASTS currently trades at $113.41 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while GOGO trades at $4.57 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).