ASTE vs CAT

Astec Industries, Inc. vs Caterpillar, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASTE

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Astec Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$50.54
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CAT

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Caterpillar, Inc.
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$887.67
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASTE Fair ValueASTE Upside CAT Fair ValueCAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.50 -61.4% $271.66 -69.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.91 -80.4% $105.47 -88.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASTE vs CAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASTE vs CAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CAT scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs ASTE's 9.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) and Caterpillar, Inc. (CAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASTE currently trades at $50.54 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while CAT trades at $887.67 with a QOC of 9.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).