ASPN vs AWI

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. vs Armstrong World Industries Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASPN

Building Products & Equipment
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$6.37
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

AWI

Building Products & Equipment
Armstrong World Industries Inc
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$160.34
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASPN Fair ValueASPN Upside AWI Fair ValueAWI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.17 +28.3% $47.85 -70.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $33.54 +426.6% $71.43 -55.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASPN vs AWI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASPN vs AWI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AWI scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs ASPN's 5.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) and Armstrong World Industries Inc (AWI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASPN currently trades at $6.37 with a QOC of 5.8/10, while AWI trades at $160.34 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).