ASIC vs CINF

Ategrity Specialty Insurance Co vs Cincinnati Financial Corporatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASIC

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Ategrity Specialty Insurance Co
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$19.88
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CINF

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Cincinnati Financial Corporatio
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$160.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASIC Fair ValueASIC Upside CINF Fair ValueCINF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $36.07 +81.4% $332.89 +108.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.36 -37.9% $73.81 -53.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASIC vs CINF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASIC vs CINF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CINF scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs ASIC's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ategrity Specialty Insurance Co (ASIC) and Cincinnati Financial Corporatio (CINF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASIC currently trades at $19.88 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while CINF trades at $160.00 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).