ASC vs CCEC

Ardmore Shipping Corporation vs Capital Clean Energy Carriers C — Valuation Comparison 2026

ASC

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$16.08
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CCEC

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Capital Clean Energy Carriers C
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$22.24
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ASC Fair ValueASC Upside CCEC Fair ValueCCEC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.79 +35.5% $27.44 +23.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.51 -71.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $11.70 -27.2% $13.86 -37.7%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ASC vs CCEC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ASC vs CCEC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ASC scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs CCEC's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers C (CCEC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ASC currently trades at $16.08 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while CCEC trades at $22.24 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).