ARW vs NSIT

Arrow Electronics, Inc. vs Insight Enterprises, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ARW

Electronics & Computer Distribution
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$216.01
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NSIT

Electronics & Computer Distribution
Insight Enterprises, Inc.
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$103.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ARW Fair ValueARW Upside NSIT Fair ValueNSIT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $86.30 -60.0% $33.31 -67.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.11 -88.4% $38.90 -62.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ARW vs NSIT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ARW vs NSIT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ARW scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs NSIT's 7.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) and Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ARW currently trades at $216.01 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while NSIT trades at $103.38 with a QOC of 7.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).