ARW vs CLMB

Arrow Electronics, Inc. vs Climb Global Solutions, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ARW

Electronics & Computer Distribution
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$216.01
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CLMB

Electronics & Computer Distribution
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$20.79
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ARW Fair ValueARW Upside CLMB Fair ValueCLMB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $86.30 -60.0% $7.98 -61.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.11 -88.4% $11.95 -42.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ARW vs CLMB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ARW vs CLMB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CLMB scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs ARW's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) and Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ARW currently trades at $216.01 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while CLMB trades at $20.79 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).