ARGX vs ATRA

argenx SE vs Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ARGX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
argenx SE
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$835.99
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ATRA

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$10.51
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ARGX Fair ValueARGX Upside ATRA Fair ValueATRA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $269.52 -67.8% $1.88 -82.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $363.38 -53.4% $49.72 +496.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ARGX vs ATRA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ARGX vs ATRA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ATRA scores higher with a 4.8/10 quality rating vs ARGX's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing argenx SE (ARGX) and Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ATRA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ARGX currently trades at $835.99 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while ATRA trades at $10.51 with a QOC of 4.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).