ARES vs ASA

Ares Management Corporation vs ASA Gold and Precious Metals L — Valuation Comparison 2026

ARES

Asset Management
Ares Management Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
55
WARN
Price
$126.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ASA

Asset Management
ASA Gold and Precious Metals L
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$62.99
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ARES Fair ValueARES Upside ASA Fair ValueASA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $308.77 +145.1% $16.68 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $38.23 -69.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $602.44 +378.1% $8.77 -86.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ARES vs ASA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ARES vs ASA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ARES scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs ASA's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals L (ASA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ARES currently trades at $126.00 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while ASA trades at $62.99 with a QOC of 2.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).