AREB vs HLIO

American Rebel Holdings, Inc. vs Helios Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AREB

Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products
American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$0.05
Last close
Models
3/13
Active
VS

HLIO

Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products
Helios Technologies, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$83.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AREB Fair ValueAREB Upside HLIO Fair ValueHLIO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $40.23 -51.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.69 -65.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.05 -83.1% $25.83 -68.9%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.13 +148.2% $1.70 -98.0%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AREB vs HLIO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AREB vs HLIO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLIO scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs AREB's 4.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB) and Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AREB currently trades at $0.05 with a QOC of 4.3/10, while HLIO trades at $83.09 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).