ARE vs AVB

Alexandria Real Estate Equities vs AvalonBay Communities, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ARE

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Alexandria Real Estate Equities
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$49.68
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

AVB

Real Estate Investment Trusts
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$182.51
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ARE Fair ValueARE Upside AVB Fair ValueAVB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $135.19 +172.1% $61.64 -66.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $129.50 -29.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $58.37 +17.5% $254.50 +39.4%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ARE vs AVB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ARE vs AVB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AVB scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs ARE's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ARE currently trades at $49.68 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while AVB trades at $182.51 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).