APWC vs AYI

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corpo vs Acuity Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

APWC

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corpo
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.43
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

AYI

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Acuity Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$300.31
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType APWC Fair ValueAPWC Upside AYI Fair ValueAYI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.38 -73.5% $129.44 -56.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $127.31 -57.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $1.80 +20.0% $206.90 -31.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for APWC vs AYI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

APWC vs AYI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AYI scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs APWC's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corpo (APWC) and Acuity Inc. (AYI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

APWC currently trades at $1.43 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while AYI trades at $300.31 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).