APUS vs BCRX

Apimeds Pharmaceuticals US, Inc vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

APUS

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Apimeds Pharmaceuticals US, Inc
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$1.36
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

BCRX

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$9.10
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType APUS Fair ValueAPUS Upside BCRX Fair ValueBCRX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.39 -71.3% $14.22 +66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.33 -74.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $3.88 +185.2%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for APUS vs BCRX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

APUS vs BCRX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BCRX scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs APUS's 4.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Apimeds Pharmaceuticals US, Inc (APUS) and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BCRX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

APUS currently trades at $1.36 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while BCRX trades at $9.10 with a QOC of 6.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).