APOS vs ARES

Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Ares Management Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

APOS

Investment Advice
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$26.07
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

ARES

Investment Advice
Ares Management Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
55
WARN
Price
$128.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType APOS Fair ValueAPOS Upside ARES Fair ValueARES Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $308.78 +140.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $64.27 +146.5% $38.23 -70.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $20.90 -19.8% $602.44 +368.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for APOS vs ARES — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

APOS vs ARES — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ARES scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs APOS's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APOS) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

APOS currently trades at $26.07 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while ARES trades at $128.50 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).