APLD vs BR

Applied Digital Corporation vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, — Valuation Comparison 2026

APLD

Information Technology Services
Applied Digital Corporation
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$49.65
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

BR

Information Technology Services
Broadridge Financial Solutions,
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$149.72
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType APLD Fair ValueAPLD Upside BR Fair ValueBR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.50 -66.8% $82.21 -45.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $38.49 -74.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $6.09 -82.6% $113.78 -24.0%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for APLD vs BR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

APLD vs BR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BR scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs APLD's 4.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, (BR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

APLD currently trades at $49.65 with a QOC of 4.2/10, while BR trades at $149.72 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).