AMR vs HCC

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, vs Warrior Met Coal, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AMR

Coking Coal
Alpha Metallurgical Resources,
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$213.72
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HCC

Coking Coal
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$104.58
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AMR Fair ValueAMR Upside HCC Fair ValueHCC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $599.85 +180.7% $115.08 +10.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $100.96 -52.8% $7.90 -92.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AMR vs HCC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AMR vs HCC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HCC scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs AMR's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Alpha Metallurgical Resources, (AMR) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AMR currently trades at $213.72 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while HCC trades at $104.58 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).