AIZ vs CINF

Assurant, Inc. vs Cincinnati Financial Corporatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

AIZ

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Assurant, Inc.
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$247.40
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CINF

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Cincinnati Financial Corporatio
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$160.00
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AIZ Fair ValueAIZ Upside CINF Fair ValueCINF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $151.41 -38.8% $332.89 +108.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $266.56 +7.7% $73.81 -53.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AIZ vs CINF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AIZ vs CINF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AIZ scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs CINF's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Assurant, Inc. (AIZ) and Cincinnati Financial Corporatio (CINF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AIZ currently trades at $247.40 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while CINF trades at $160.00 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).