AGMH vs ANET

AGM Group Holdings Inc. vs Arista Networks, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AGMH

Computer Hardware
AGM Group Holdings Inc.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.36
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

ANET

Computer Hardware
Arista Networks, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$155.27
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AGMH Fair ValueAGMH Upside ANET Fair ValueANET Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.36 -73.2% $26.76 -82.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.44 +291.7% $25.64 -83.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AGMH vs ANET — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AGMH vs ANET — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ANET scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs AGMH's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AGMH currently trades at $1.36 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while ANET trades at $155.27 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).