AEIS vs APWC

Advanced Energy Industries, Inc vs Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corpo — Valuation Comparison 2026

AEIS

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$317.08
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

APWC

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corpo
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.43
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AEIS Fair ValueAEIS Upside APWC Fair ValueAPWC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $47.24 -85.1% $0.38 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $46.91 -85.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $139.83 -55.9% $1.80 +20.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AEIS vs APWC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AEIS vs APWC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AEIS scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs APWC's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Advanced Energy Industries, Inc (AEIS) and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corpo (APWC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AEIS currently trades at $317.08 with a QOC of 9.1/10, while APWC trades at $1.43 with a QOC of 1.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).